Home / Chair's Blog / Tactical Nuclear Weapons: An Answer to Cold Start Doctrine

Tactical Nuclear Weapons: An Answer to Cold Start Doctrine

Chair’s Blog

Tactical Nuclear Weapons(TNW) have been developed by Pakistan as an answer to India’s dangerous nuclear thought processes, radiating erratic war fighting concepts like: conducting a limited conventional war under nuclear over-hang and  Cold Start Doctrine, now renamed as Pro Active Operation . Hatf-IX-NASR-missile Indian strategic mindset prompted Pakistan to look for viable solutions in terms of compatible weapon systems. This necessity  has taken Pakistan forward in its quest for deterrence, or say avoidance of war. In this pursuit, development of tactical nuclear weapons, and short-range missiles to deliver them, has improved the country’s deterrence capability, thereby minimizing the  dangers of war in South Asia.  It is not fair to blame Pakistan for the  development of nuclear weapons, as it was India which started the race and after achieving the nuclear capability,  also began hurling threats on Pakistan. Pakistan was forced to go nuclear to safeguard  its security as it had suffered repeatedly at the hands of India in the past. Pakistan has neither resources nor intention to enter into an arms race with India; but it surely has to take steps to ward off imminent dangers to its security and survival.  Nuclear weapons cause havoc, therefore it is in the fitness of things to minimize the danger of escalation of any crisis into conflict leading to a shooting war. Development of tactical weapons is an  indication of Pakistan’s responsible behaviour to contain the threat and danger in the event of a war. No country with peaceful intentions towards Pakistan has to worry about Pakistan’s nuclear capability and potential. as it is purely meant to safeguard its interests against any aggression.  Security and safety of Pakistan’s  nuclear weapons as well as robustness of  its impeccable command and control system  have been acknowledged by World Class political leaders, strategists and technical experts.  Pakistan needs short range tactical nuclear missiles (TNW) to deter India.  Using TNWs is a cost-cutting method of matching the conventional battlefield strength of India. Moreover, it is easier to justify the use of a TNW against invading enemy formations ( in counter force role) than to justify launching a strategic missile against non-combatants (in counter value role). As part of composite dialogue with India, Pakistan’s offer of Strategic Restraint Regime  is still on the table.  Its essential components focus at addressing  conventional imbalance, nuclear weapons and  Missile systems.

About admin

Check Also

Trump-Kim summit: beginning of another fiasco?

North Korea will have to wait for a while to see what is more hurting: American sanctions or trusting America. It is interesting that after stampeding Iran nuclear deal only weeks ago President Trump found a willing state to ink a fresh but highly vague nuclear framework. True to his usual Madman approach towards diplomacy, Trump has declared that the North Korea is no longer a nuclear threat. NorthKorean media has since switched over to a jubilant mode, calling it a great victory, claiming that North Korea had won major concessions as the US president said: “the World has taken a big step back from potential Nuclear catastrophe!” “No more rocket launches, nuclear testing or research! The hostages are back home with their families. Thank you to Chairman Kim, our day together was historic!” Trump had twittered. Kim had made great gestures prior to summit, dismantling of nuclear testing site, removal of three top military generals and letting go American hostages alongside a promise of a moratorium on missile testing as well. On the other hand, Trump played hard, he even walked away from the summit; he reverse paddled after receiving a big letter from Kim. Retired Admiral Harry Harris, the US ambassador designate to South Korea has challenged Trump's claim that North Korea no longer poses a nuclear threat to the world, saying that "we have to continue to worry about that." North Korea’s media said that President Trump had not only promised to end joint military drills with South Korea, but also to lift sanctions and allow a “step-by-step” denuclearization process, rather than the immediate dismantling of its nuclear program. Independent analysts have pointed to the lack of substance in the agreement that has committed the US to unspecified security guarantees for North Korea in exchange for denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula. Many have said that though Pyongyang had vowed in the past to denuclearize but had repeatedly broken such promises.On paper, there is nothing President Trump could extract from North Korean leader, that Kim’s father and grandfather had not already given to past American presidents. In fact, he got less, at least for now. Did Kim play blind or he has had credible assurances through back channels. While analysts were hoping that after Iran nuclear deal fiasco, it would be Kim, walking away from the summit citing credibility issue with Trump, he was seen as dying for the summit, this eagerness surprised many. Have long biting sanctions sapped Kim’s will to resist, or is there an undercover understanding on the issue between China and the US on the final outcome of settlement.

One comment

  1. M. Suleman Shahid

    Interesting. Intrinsically, there are three purposes of development of TNWs by Pakistan, first to counter Indian CSD, second counterweight to indian BMD system and third Indian conventional hegemony.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *