Home / Pakistan Focus Analysis / National [in]Action Plan

National [in]Action Plan

Poor execution of nine of the 20 areas of National Action Plan (NAP) has irked Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, who directed Interior Minister to take these points seriously. Last week saw a lot of enthusiasm with regard to gauging the implementation of NAP. This was the first time since NAP was formulated in December 2014 that the civilian and military leadership sat together at the federal level to evaluate how the plan was progressing. While the Prime Minister and his team are struggling to implement the NAP, the resistance is phenomenal.

The decline in terrorist attacks because of action against militant in North Waziristan and Khyber Agency has generated an impression that NAP is performing well. But, beneath the surface there are grey areas, which came to surface during the meeting. Execution of the 20 points NAP is moving at snail’s speed, to say the least. Listing the nine weak points, the premier said a lot needs to be done as regards madrassas, the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority, terrorist financing, reforms in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas, Afghan refugees, legal amendments, the National Counter-Terrorism Authority (Nacta), religious persecution and sectarianism. The cabinet expressed satisfaction over progress in the remaining areas of the NAP.

Main challenge to implementation of NAP is posed by criminalization of politics and politicization of crime. As a corollary, there is underlying fear that anti-terror laws shall be used against political workers; even if they are not used, there are ample hoax calls to portray such usage. Hence, there is an undercurrent within mid-level political cadres across the political divide to go slow on NAP. Another closely associated impediment originates from the behavior of political appointees in law enforcing agencies (LEAS); they are more loyal to their appointing personalities and less to pay master—the state/government.

Confusion also prevails over what is and what is not ‘terrorism’; leaving much room for the low ranking investigators to terrorize ordinary criminal on the pretext of booking them under terror laws to fleece them; while at the same time intentionally framing weak charge-sheets against actual terrorists, either under duress or incentive. Apparently, criminal-terrorist cartels appear effective in buying time by impeding the pace of NAP implementation in view of sunset clause about military courts. Even though resorting to military courts is not an ideal way of dealing with the situation.

Symptomatic actions — ongoing operations by LEAs — have shown good progress, while foundation and consolidation focused actions are in terrible lag; hence all the more chances that, due to waning will to act, fragile gains by LEAs could fizzle out. Law making portion of the NAP posted poorest performance. Unless laws are in place how the prosecution would be able to stand in the court of law? Matters which should have been resolved within days are haunting even after months. Principal areas of concern include terror financing, madrassah reforms, regulating NGOs, illegal arms and preventing persecution of religious and sectarian minorities.

Prime Minister has rightly emphasized that simultaneous implementation of all 20 points of NAP on eradication of terrorism is important. He said collective wisdom must prevail while taking decisions to make NAP a success, “it is our collective responsibility to join hands for complete success of the plan.” He also laid stress on strict implementation of the NAP in all provinces, Azad Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan.
The meeting was apprised that al Qaeda and its attached wings have been rooted out from the city of Karachi! Those making such claims need to know what Hamid Karzai said about Al Qaeda on the 14th anniversary of 9/11. While speaking to Al Jazeera English’s “Up Front” he opined that Al Qaeda has never operated in Afghanistan, dismissing the notion that the terror group plotted the 9/11 terror attacks inside the country as “a myth”. “I don’t know if Al Qaeda existed and I don’t know if they exist [in Afghanistan],” Karzai said. On whether he believed Osama bin Laden plotted the attacks from Afghanistan, Karzai said, “That is what I have heard from our Western friends. That is what the Western media says.” “I have not seen them and I’ve not had any report about them, any report that would indicate that Al Qaeda is operating in Afghanistan”.
During the meeting, Federal interior minister said that the army has cleared Swat after the military operation and that security forces have eliminated terrorist network in North Waziristan. “No one doubts sacrifices offered by Pakistan Army jawans but other institutions have also done their jobs”, he said, adding that several terrorist attacks were thwarted but the government doesn’t advertise that. He informed that so far as part of Operation Zarb-e-Azb, around 11,000 intelligence based operations have been conducted.

It is horrifying to learn that special courts formed under the Pakistan Protection Act 2014 (PPA) have not yet started functioning, which indicates lack of will on the part of those responsible for making these courts functional. Clearly sense of urgency is missing. More surprisingly some of the provinces were under the perception that after the provision of military courts, they thought as if there was no need of special courts, how innocent of them! However, it is refreshing that government is making these special courts functional and increasing their number as well. Hundreds of cases have already been cleared by ministries of law and interior for trial in these special courts. Both military and special courts have been asked to speed up the trial of ‘hardcore terrorists’. Now cases of criminals involved in sectarian violence will also be tried in special courts. Around 50 cases are already being tried in nine military courts which have disposed of 28 cases.

Another glaring inadequacy is that there has also been no headway regarding registration of seminaries and regulation of international as well as local NGOs. The problem is that it is not fair to pick-up only these two brands while a number of other entities under different nomenclatures are allowed to carry out similar educational and public welfare activities without registration and regulatory strictures. Hopefully, the upcoming policy regarding NGOs and seminaries will take care of these issues. It is a sheer criminal neglect that thousands of NGOs are operating in the country but there is no available information regarding who is doing what and how they are funded. Several NGOs are doing good work, however, in the absence of who’s who; all of these are seen with suspicion.

The UK has five examination bodies, none is allowed to make own syllabus, they follow the syllabus formulated by the government. In Pakistan we not only need to determine syllabus for religious seminaries, but also for all other non-government certificate and degree awarding educational entities. Here also, the problem starts when we cherry pick madrasahs for scrutiny and skip others institutions operating under various trusts and charities.

Shadowy issuance of arms licenses is yet another cause for small weapons proliferation, though a small one; its main cause is illicit trade of such arms which is now a common specter even in some of the urban centres as well. In view of precarious security situation, business of private security companies have mushroomed, creating a false specter of security; businesses are being fleeced in the name of security. Some of the security agencies are providing armed guards with zero experience of weapon handling; there is hardly any practice of mandatory annual musketry firing by these guards; in case of eventuality, such quack guards are likely to be more of a hazard for the employer than for the criminals.

Choking the terror financing is anther weak area. In addition to the hazards of informal economy and its linkages with terror financing, people are being discouraged to conduct transactions through bank by slamming numerous taxes on benign withdrawals and transfers.

Gains achieved by military operations would be lost if NAP implementation does not pick up requisite speed to deny space to terrorists and militants. Military actions involving the use of force should complement the government’s broader campaign to fight against extremism and terrorism, but this is not happening. Gains through military operations would be lost if NAP implementation does not improve immediately and deny space to terrorists and militants.

About admin

Check Also

Trump’s new found love for Pakistan

Now the US president has adopted a formal, diplomatic way of approaching its frontline partner in the terror war, instead of making use of the crude oratory that he is best at. Trump’s letter indicates that now there is a realization within the US administration that Pakistan’s co-operation is vital to ensuring peace in Afghanistan. Federal Minister for Human Rights Shireen Mazari demolished Khalilzad for his hawkish approach towards Islamabad by advising him to bring a “less arrogant and hostile mind set” during his visit to Islamabad. She credited Imran Khan for promptly responding to Trump’s Twitter tirade. She claimed that premier’s reply had ‘compelled Trump to do a reality check’. “So much for those in Pakistan who were quivering after Imran Khan’s tweets,” she added.Pakistan has suffered more than 75,000 casualties in the war on terrorism as it had agreed to cooperate with the US in that effort, even though “no Pakistani was involved” in the 9/11 attacks. Instead of “making Pakistan a scapegoat for their failures,” the United States should undertake a “serious assessment” of why, after a war involving hundreds of thousands of NATO and Afghan troops and more than $1 trillion in costs, the Taliban today are stronger than ever before. Since Pakistan has always advocated a political settlement to end war in Afghanistan, the US decision is welcomed,” the Foreign Ministry said in a statement. “Pakistan reiterates its commitment to play a facilitation role in good faith. Peace and stability in Afghanistan remains a shared responsibility,” statement added. If current phase of diplomacy between the US and Pakistan is steered well, it could help ease tension between Washington and Islamabad; and bring peace to Afghanistan.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *