Home / Pakistan Focus Analysis / Intolerant India!

Intolerant India!

Pakistan’s former Foreign Minister Khursheed Mahmud Kasuri’s book launching in Mumbai was a purely literary event but the intolerant attitude of Shiv Sena even to such harmless events  has ,yet once again, exposed claims of Indian secularism. The situation is going to worsen further if Modi government continues to encourage such extremists activities. Freedom of expression is under threat in India and many of its  citizens are speaking out against the frenzy of violence and repression. Some of the violence and intimidation has been Pakistan-related and some Muslim related.  ‘Shining India’,  the hollow slogan is no longer relevant. Intolerant India showed its face once again when activists of the hard-line Hindu Shiv Sena Party, allied to the ruling BJP, threw black ink on the face of Sudheendra Kulkarni, the organizer of  the book launch ceremony. The BJP government in India needs to realize that this not only casts a deep shadow over the region and its people, it has the potential to isolate its own citizens. Both Kasuri and Kulkarni must be appreciated for  refusing to cave.  Earlier the classical maestro Ustad Ghulam Ali had to call off his tour to India as he was not allowed to perform by Shiv Sena.  Freedom and civil liberties are under threat in India. For now, India presents a rather dark image.

Article 25 of Indian constitution states that: “Every person has the right to practice their faith as they choose, or no faith at all without fear or discrimination”. However, in practice such rights are flouted quite frequently. The ongoing beef controversy in India has reinforced the conviction behind creation of Pakistan. Many Muslims living in various parts of India have stated that Quaid-e-Azam had accomplished a good job by creating a new country for Muslims, where there is no ban on beef. The current Indian government, has imposed a ban on beef in several states of India. Ban was also imposed in Jammu and Kashmir where people showed their disapproval by calling strikes and slaughtering animals to defy the order. This beef ban controversy has sparked several debates: it has divided India along religious lines: if a person consumes beef he is called Pakistani or augarwadi (terrorist) or desh drohi (traitor); and if he does not, he is considered a patriot.
Discriminatory behaviour of Indian government towards the Muslims of India and Indian Held Kashmir (IHK) is on the rise since BJP came to power. Hindu fundamentalist government of the BJP is now openly subscribing to the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) ideology. Therefore, extremist elements of Indian society are picking up the courage to take the law in their own hand to the peril of Muslims. As a result, incidents of communal violence against Muslims have increased over a period of one year.
Muhammad Akhlaq was beaten to death and his 22 years old son was severely injured on September 28 in Dadri, Utter Pardesh, after it was rumoured that the family had been storing and consuming beef. Incident was triggered by an announcement by a local temple. Now the forensic tests have revealed that family had been storing mutton in their fridge and not beef! Prime Minister Narendra Modi has come under strong criticism for not condemning the incident. Former IHK Chief Minister Omar Abdullah tweeted “why there was no outright condemnation of the Dadri lynching?” Later, incidents of beating the Muslims on this count also happened in Manipur district of UP and state assembly of IHK
Denial of legitimate entitlements to Indian Muslims have attained such a proportion that Vice President Hamid Ansari has publically called upon the BJP government to take “affirmative action” to enforce rights of Indian Muslims as Indian constitution grants special “reservation” (quota) in government jobs, educational institution etc. He said these rights were admissible in Indian state practice but denied to Muslims. He gave example of many reports commissioned by successive governments and added that India’s Muslims faced issue such as identity and security, education and empowerment, equitable share in state funds and a fair share in decision making. He made these remarks at the golden jubilee celebrations of a Muslim entity, the All India Majlis-e-Mushawwarat (consultative meeting).
Indian newspaper “The Hindu” reported on September 02 that the Vice-President came under attack from the BJP and the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) on this count. VHP general secretary Surendra Jain said the Vice-President’s remarks were “communal” and did not reflect the dignity of his office. BJP general secretary Kailash Vijaywargiya termed the Vice-President’s remarks as not commensurate with the constitutional position that he occupies. “A Vice-President’s post is a constitutional position pertaining to the entire country and not to a particular community”. He added that Muslims enjoyed more constitutional right than in many Muslim countries and went as far as to say that “even the country’s partition was accepted to appease Muslims”.
There are various categories of marginalized segment of Indian citizens including Dalits, Mahadalits, Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Other Backward Classes (OBC), Extremely Backward Classes (EBC), etc. Vice President Hamid Ansari had merely asked government to take definite steps for rights of Muslims and other neglected classes in India. He had pointed out that caste discrimination existed among Muslim communities in India and “corrective strategies therefore have to be sought on category-differentiation admissible in Indian state practice and denied to Muslims”. Ansari had talked about recognising scheduled castes among Muslims and not reservations for Muslims on religious grounds. The statement was about the things already stated in the Sachar Commission Report. Privilege of reservation has been denied to Indian Muslim on the pretext of their overall number in India. Release of politically sensitive religious census data, ahead of elections in states such as Bihar, Assam and West Bengal is also aimed at creating the bogey of the so-called “Muslim dominance”.
Congress and Communist Party of India has supported Mr Ansari’s demand. Several reports including the Sachar Committee Report (2006) have highlighted the plight of the Muslims; indicating that on most socio-economic indicators, Muslim were on the margins or even worse than the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes. The Kundu Report (2014) commissioned to evaluate the implementation of the Sachar Commission had concluded that “serious’ bottle-necks remained.”
Quota is increasingly becoming a highly sensitive issue in the Indian political landscape. In August, the Patel community of Gujarat protested, in large numbers, demanding reservation of jobs for them. Provision of reservation has been cleverly utilized by some backward communities for their socio-economic and political empowerment. Moreover, the mainstream political parties have also exploited the issues for political gains. Support for Muslim reservation, however, is almost negligible. While Congress has paid lip service to the idea, BJP is aggressively against it.
Most glaring manifestation of Indian intransigence towards Muslims is its handling of the territory and the people of IHK. India’s 700,000-plus troops are stationed in Kashmir that makes it the most militarised conflict zone of the world. The law enforcement agencies are empowered by draconian laws which have frequently been condemned by numerous Indian and international Human Rights watchdogs. Another way to resolve the Kashmir dispute is through listening to Mahatma Gandhi, who said on 29 July 1947 in Delhi, “I am not going to suggest to the Maharaja (Ruler of Kashmir) to accede to India and not to Pakistan. The real sovereign of the state are the people. The ruler is a servant of the people. If he is not so then he is not the ruler. This is my firm belief…In Kashmir too the power belongs to the public. Let them do as they want.”
BJP government is communalizing the Indian politics which is likely to add to the plight of largest Indian minority—the Muslims. At the same time it is sponsoring terrorism in Pakistan. Pakistan has taken the right step by informing the UNSG about Indian designs. The peace initiative offered by Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif during his address to UNGA could pave the way for the peace and stability in the region. PM’s initiative proposes: Expansion of United Nations’ Military Observer Group in Indian and Pakistan’s mandate to monitor the observance of the ceasefire; Reaffirmation by both India and Pakistan not to resort to the use or the threat of use of force under any circumstances; Demilitarization of Kashmir; and an unconditional mutual withdrawal from Siachen Glacier. However, India does not appear in the listening mode.
Indian paper Business Line reported on September 04 that RSS has publically asserted its ideological supremacy and the right to “guide” the BJP government. This was amply demonstrated during the three-day Samanvay Baithak (coordination meeting) of the RSS and its affiliates. The meeting saw senior ministers making presentations with regard to performance of their respective ministries’ work before the RSS. The CPI (M) and the Congress have rightly termed it as “remote controlling” the government. Such incidents put huge question marks on the security of the minorities living in India; it could lead India towards political polarization on communal lines.

About admin

Check Also

Afghan peace process back to Doha

Marathon talks between US Special Envoy Ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad and Taliban, in Doha, are concentrating on two questions: continuation of American military bases in Afghanistan, and Taliban guarantees of not letting Afghanistan’s territory be used as launching pad against any third country. Taliban are also ready to undertake that they would not support Al-Qaida and Daesh. Mullah Berader is now leading Taliban’s team. Both sides have acknowledged progress on vital points. For the first time Afghan peace process may be moving in the right direction. During the fifth trip of US Special Envoy Ambassador Zalmay to Pakistan, both sided reiterated their shared intent of an Afghan led and Afghan owned political settlement of Afghan conflict. Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid said the dispute highlights a split that has emerged among countries with an interest in the region, with Pakistan and the US pushing Taliban to open talks with Kabul and other countries, including Iran, supporting the Taliban’s stance; “Iran and Qatar are supporting Taliban’s way but Pakistan is saying what the Afghan government and the US wanted”.Pakistan is not averse to the US’ demands but wants a ‘regional consensus’ on it since permanent presence of the US military in Afghanistan would certainly raise eyebrows in Russia, Iran and even China. These countries fear that the US may use the Afghan soil to advance its own strategic designs in the region. For this reason, Pakistan is striving to evolve a regional consensus on the possible Afghan peace deal. Guarantees and assurances aimed at promoting peace and security of both Afghanistan and other countries are understandable. However, demand for permanent military presence is indicative of the desire not only to keep Afghans subjugated but also to brow-beat other regional countries.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *