Home / Chair's Blog / Pakistan Focus condemns the PCA award on South China Sea

Pakistan Focus condemns the PCA award on South China Sea

  • Pakistan Focus condemns the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA)’s award on South China Sea. The Philippines had filed a compulsory arbitration against China at The Hague-based PCA in 2013. China maintains that the tribunal has no jurisdiction over the case, which is in essence about territorial sovereignty and maritime delimitation. China, therefore, had made it clear it will not accept or get involved in those proceedings.

    Pakistan Focus  recognizes China’s declaration to defend its historical territory and fully endorsed the position taken by China on the South China Sea in regard to its sovereignty over Nansha Islands and the surrounding waters. Pakistan Focus is of the view that disputes over the South China Sea should be peacefully resolved, through consultations and negotiations by states directly concerned, in accordance with bilateral agreements and the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea (DOC).  The tribunal also ruled that China had violated the Philippines’ sovereign rights by constructing artificial islands there, and caused “permanent irreparable harm to the coral reef ecosystem.”

    Pakistan Focus condemns imposition of unilateral will on others, and respects China’s statement of optional exception in light of Article 298 of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). Maintenance of peace and security is the collective responsibility of all parties to the South China Sea. 

    Chinese position is that  it has full rights over the sea and has moved ahead with construction of island sites.  In a statement, the Foreign Ministry “solemnly declares that the award is null and void and has no binding force,” and said “China’s territorial sovereignty and maritime rights and interests in the South China Sea shall under no circumstances be affected by those awards.” Pakistan Focus stands by China’s statement.

 

About admin

Check Also

America shreds Iran nuclear dea

America Shreds Iran Nuclear Deal

Strategically, nuke and missile rattling North Korea suits the US, for it provides justification for keeping the US garrison in South Korea, setting up Missile Defence systems in the ribs of China and Russia and ultimately procuring a request from South Korea for redeploying US nukes. Under the circumstances, when deal with North Korea was clearly visible, one tend to think whether timing of withdrawal from Iranian deal was carefully selected so as not to let the deal with North Korea materialize. While undoing the legacies of his predecessor, President Donald Trump is ending up in eroding American credibility beyond redemption. With one rash announcement, Trump has imperiled peace and shown the rest of the world that his country cannot be counted on to abide by international agreements. He is in such an indecent hurry that he does not care about the crippling voids he is leaving behind. His latest action of shredding the Iran nuclear deal has not only isolated the US but has also marginalized his persona among his countrymen. Top American generals and UN mandated nuclear regulator International Atomic Energy Agency(IAEA) are of the view that Iran has not violated the 2015 deal. Leading officials of American military establishment contrary to Trump’s remarks that the deal was most flawed, think of the deal “pretty robust” in the words of Defence Secretary James Mattis. Even officials of Israeli military believed the agreement to be a "fair one". The deal was a win-win deal for all parties involved. While Trump has announced that the US will exit the nuclear agreement for it has “terrible flaws”, he failed to point out any one section of the deal that hampers the US interests. Instead, he relied on evidence that does not suggest a single instance where Iran is in violation of the nuclear agreement. North Korea will think many times over before entering into a nuclear deal in which the US is a party.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *