Home / Articles / Indian Occupied Kashmir on brink

Indian Occupied Kashmir on brink

Indian Occupied Kashmir on brink. Amidst Indian atrocities in Indian Occupied Kashmir (IOK), APHC leader Syed Ali Geelani has written a letter to the members of the UN Security Council, European Union and Organisation of Islamic Conference calling upon them to intervene. Addressees of the letter certainly have a special responsibility to ask India to stop the reign of terror unleashed in Indian-held Kashmir for more than a week. Geelani said he wrote the letter “on behalf of the oppressed and besieged people to draw the attention of the world community”.

He wants the world community to “take measures to build confidence among the people of the Occupied Jammu and Kashmir and to create an atmosphere conducive for the resolution of the dispute… as per the principle of Right to Self-Determination and as enshrined in the various UN Resolutions on Jammu and Kashmir”.

Indian occupied Kashmir on brink
Indian occupied Kashmir on brink

Geelani wants India to allow UN Special Rapporteurs and all international human rights and humanitarian organisations to work in IOK.  He has also asked world leaders to push India to accept the disputed nature of the state, rapidly demilitarise the region, repeal “draconian laws like Armed Forces Special Powers Act and the Public Safety Act”; and release all political prisoners. “These steps, if taken with a sense of urgency and responsibility, can help restore calm and peace in an agitated population and pave way for the processes required for the final and just resolution of the dispute of Jammu and Kashmir, thereby disperse the perpetual clouds of war and conflict that threatens global peace,” says the letter. “…therefore we urge the international community to pave way for an international inquiry led by the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR),” the letter reads. “This inquiry is not unprecedented. Recently, the OHCHR instituted an inquiry into the crimes perpetrated by the Sri Lankan government.”

Cause of Kashmiri people enjoys across the board national support under cutting all sorts of divides. Horrendous episode of martyrdom of innocent Kashmiri brethren at the hands of Indian security forces continues while Kashmiri leaders in IOK remained under detention or arrest. Maqbool Bhat in 1984, Afzal Guru in 2013 and now Burhan Wani has become the rallying point for, decades’ long history of home-grown militancy in IOK goes on. An audio clip is virulent in IOK, reportedly bearing the voice of Burhan’s mother is being circulated in Kashmir in the aftermath of violence has her shouting: “Tum kitne Burhan maaroge?” A crowd responds, “Har ghar se Burhan niklega… Jeeve jeeve Pakistan…” Most of the Facebook sites being used by protestors have also been blocked. While Wani has become an internationally recognized legend, it is shameful that some pseudo intellectuals in Pakistan are adamant in calling him a terrorist.

After the emergency meeting convened by the Indian Prime Minster of India, it was stated that India will go on hunting militants in Kashmir. Indian Security Forces have stepped-up state terrorism in IOK. They are even attacking the ambulances and hospitals.

Inside the capital Srinagar’s Shri Maharaja Hari Singh hospital, doctors told Al Jazeera that they had performed 100 eye surgeries in the past four days; “All of them could lose their eyesight.” One senior doctor told Al Jazeera on the condition of anonymity. The Doctors’ Association of Kashmir said in a statement that security forces launched tear gas shells into a hospital where victims were being treated, and police beat hospital staff and damaged ambulances. “Doctors are working in operating theatres round-the-clock. We’ve operated on 90 [now well over 100] for serious eye injuries, they are going to walk out of the hospital as one-eyed boys,” said a doctor in Hari Singh Hospital.

Indian security forces are using pellet guns to quell the demonstrators. This duck hunting weapon sends, in each single shot, nearly 600 high velocity ball bearings made of lead; the youngest victim was a four-year-old girl. Rights groups say that pellet gun blinds people and must be banned, India insist that it was a non-lethal weapon.

Congress spokesman Abhishek Manu Singhvi tweeted: “I cannot mourn a man who took up arms against my state”— indeed he played to a hyper-nationalist gallery. When it comes to Kashmir, there is hardly any difference in BJP and Congress, here the secularism of Congress perfectly merges with BJP’s Hindutva. Strategy to quell the unrest is also same: Push in a few thousand more troops into the Valley, shoot more people, declare more curfews, and look the other side when tortures and rapes happen.

Pakistan has taken up the matter with international community; the UN OIC, EU, the P-5 Middle East and African diplomats have been briefed on the gruesome killings of innocent Kashmiris. Advisor to Prime Minister of foreign Affairs has written letters to UNSG, SG of OIC and Chair of UNHRC, highlighting the current happenings in IOK. Our missions abroad are briefing their host governments as well as human rights groups and organization in their areas of accreditation. Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif has declared that Pakistan will continue to support the cause of Kashmiris. Army Chief General Raheel Sharif has also urged the world to respect desires of Kashmiris.

Intifada of Kashmiris has sent a loud and clear message to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi that his agenda to shun talks and instead rely solely on suppressive tactics to address the longstanding dispute, would not work. Kashmiris were looking towards peaceful settlement of the dispute but Modi government has pushed them to the wall. Kashmiris are braving all atrocities and expressing resolve not to accept anything less than end of the Indian occupation.

India’s attempt to camouflage its repressive actions by terming the volatile situation as its internal affair has started receiving rebuke from the world community. The US State Department has declared that Kashmir is not an internal matter of India. “Obviously, we’re concerned about the violence. We encourage all sides to make efforts towards finding a peaceful solution,” Spokesman John Kirby said.

In the wake of ongoing violence, UNSG has once again offered Pakistan and India mediation on Kashmir. Pakistan has appreciated the offer. It is the UN’s official responsibility and obligation to address the issue of Kashmir because there are UN Security Council’s resolutions on it. OIC Secretary General has deplored the use of force by the Indian security forces on innocent Kashmiris in IOK on July 13. OIC’s Independent Permanent Human Rights Commission (IPHRC) has called for an immediate end to the ongoing abrasive human rights violations.

“There is no denial in Delhi … that a problem exists,” said retired Lieutenant General Syed Ata Hasnain, an Indian army corps commander in the area from 2010 to 2012 who was deployed there seven times during his career. “But no one seems to be clear on how to get into engagement with the people on the ground.” The IOK’s deputy chief minister, Nirmal Singh of the BJP, said the government was ready to engage with the Hurriyat under a legal framework. Asked whether police and paramilitary forces used excessive force to control crowds after Wani’s killing, BJP’s Singh replied: “It is a matter of concern”.

Just because not as many were being killed since the uprising in the 1990s, India thought Kashmir was “normal”. The wounds of the 1990s were deep and stayed open. A whole new generation has been added to the population which is, even angrier. And life for a young man in the most militarised area in the world is a series of humiliations, some petty, some overwhelming.   Even the Indian media admits that Kashmir has been on the boil since the killing of Burhan. The killing spree continues and an enraged population is getting desperate.

 

 

 

About admin

Check Also

Time to create Rakhine as a Muslim State for Rohingyas

Myanmar insists that Rohingyas are interlopers from Bangladesh despite most of them living for generations in western Rakhine state of Myanmar, they have long been denied basic political rights and liberties. Bangladesh does not accept that Rohingyas have a Bengali lineage. Anthropologists believe that Rohingya roots trace back to Saudi Arabia, who migrated to Myanmar (Burma) around 7th & 8th century AC. Except Bangladesh and Myanmar who think such a return as a good idea, there are hardly any buyers of such forced eviction. United Nations doesn’t want forced eviction to happen. United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Michelle Bachelet, warned that forcing the first batch of about 2,200 Rohingya living in refugee camps to ground zero of mass violence against the minority Muslim group would be a “clear violation” of core international legal principles. Human Rights groups have called the move “dangerous and premature.” A number of Human Rights groups say “they are shocked”. Even the people who will be affected the most, Rohingya Muslims from Myanmar, are upset that their future, once again, is being decided without their input.So far Aung Suu Kyi’s leadership performance has been derisive. No one expected governing to be easy for her, as country’s leader. Her election had ended more than a half-century of military rule; yet the hegemony has not retrieved; and Bonapartism is galore. In pursuit of her over ambitious political objectives, she has been used and discredited by Junta. Suu Kyi had declared ending the long-running ethnic insurgencies that have torn the country apart as her top priority, but her lacklustre peace effort has proved ineffective. Ever since fighting between government forces and ethnic groups has been spiralling up. Though World has been shocked by reports that the military has carried out atrocities, including rape and murder, against the Rohingya, Aung Suu has said little on the matter and done even lesser. Her government’s growing suppression of speech on the Internet seems perverse for a onetime democracy icon who spent 15 years under house arrest. No wonders her popularity is on decline. Growth has slowed and foreign investment has dipped significantly. Suu Kyi faces daunting challenges. In rebuilding the country, she must overcome decades of mismanagement and profiteering by previous military governments that enriched the generals and their cronies and brought the economy to its knees. The biggest stain on Suu Kyi’s record may be her government’s brutal treatment of the Rohingya, and her tepid response to it. Prevailing World order is known for acting very fast in Muslim versus non-Muslim conflicts where outcome is likely to benefit non-Muslims. And it shows criminal negligence when Muslims are likely to gain through political settlement of any such conflict. When pushed too hard, conflict is settled in a way that it’s a paralytic outcome, ensuring mitigation of equitable advantage to Muslim faction of population. Some of the conflicts like Kashmir and Palestine are deliberately kept on back burners as their settlement would benefit Muslim segment of respective population. Myanmar’s Rohingya conflict also falls in “let ferment” category. Likewise is the situation about Afghan and Yemen crisis, as well as simmering Middle East and North African Muslim countries. Muslims are right to assume that current World Order has not served them a fair deal; and unless there is a significant change in its format, Muslims will continue to be marginalised at state, community and individual levels. But the billion dollar question is that how long the current World Political Order would take to assume ownership of Myanmar crisis? Time has already reached for declaring Rakhine as a sovereign State where Rohingyas could live peacefully and practice their religion peacefully.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *