Home / Articles / Indian Occupied Kashmir on brink

Indian Occupied Kashmir on brink

Indian Occupied Kashmir on brink. Amidst Indian atrocities in Indian Occupied Kashmir (IOK), APHC leader Syed Ali Geelani has written a letter to the members of the UN Security Council, European Union and Organisation of Islamic Conference calling upon them to intervene. Addressees of the letter certainly have a special responsibility to ask India to stop the reign of terror unleashed in Indian-held Kashmir for more than a week. Geelani said he wrote the letter “on behalf of the oppressed and besieged people to draw the attention of the world community”.

He wants the world community to “take measures to build confidence among the people of the Occupied Jammu and Kashmir and to create an atmosphere conducive for the resolution of the dispute… as per the principle of Right to Self-Determination and as enshrined in the various UN Resolutions on Jammu and Kashmir”.

Indian occupied Kashmir on brink
Indian occupied Kashmir on brink

Geelani wants India to allow UN Special Rapporteurs and all international human rights and humanitarian organisations to work in IOK.  He has also asked world leaders to push India to accept the disputed nature of the state, rapidly demilitarise the region, repeal “draconian laws like Armed Forces Special Powers Act and the Public Safety Act”; and release all political prisoners. “These steps, if taken with a sense of urgency and responsibility, can help restore calm and peace in an agitated population and pave way for the processes required for the final and just resolution of the dispute of Jammu and Kashmir, thereby disperse the perpetual clouds of war and conflict that threatens global peace,” says the letter. “…therefore we urge the international community to pave way for an international inquiry led by the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR),” the letter reads. “This inquiry is not unprecedented. Recently, the OHCHR instituted an inquiry into the crimes perpetrated by the Sri Lankan government.”

Cause of Kashmiri people enjoys across the board national support under cutting all sorts of divides. Horrendous episode of martyrdom of innocent Kashmiri brethren at the hands of Indian security forces continues while Kashmiri leaders in IOK remained under detention or arrest. Maqbool Bhat in 1984, Afzal Guru in 2013 and now Burhan Wani has become the rallying point for, decades’ long history of home-grown militancy in IOK goes on. An audio clip is virulent in IOK, reportedly bearing the voice of Burhan’s mother is being circulated in Kashmir in the aftermath of violence has her shouting: “Tum kitne Burhan maaroge?” A crowd responds, “Har ghar se Burhan niklega… Jeeve jeeve Pakistan…” Most of the Facebook sites being used by protestors have also been blocked. While Wani has become an internationally recognized legend, it is shameful that some pseudo intellectuals in Pakistan are adamant in calling him a terrorist.

After the emergency meeting convened by the Indian Prime Minster of India, it was stated that India will go on hunting militants in Kashmir. Indian Security Forces have stepped-up state terrorism in IOK. They are even attacking the ambulances and hospitals.

Inside the capital Srinagar’s Shri Maharaja Hari Singh hospital, doctors told Al Jazeera that they had performed 100 eye surgeries in the past four days; “All of them could lose their eyesight.” One senior doctor told Al Jazeera on the condition of anonymity. The Doctors’ Association of Kashmir said in a statement that security forces launched tear gas shells into a hospital where victims were being treated, and police beat hospital staff and damaged ambulances. “Doctors are working in operating theatres round-the-clock. We’ve operated on 90 [now well over 100] for serious eye injuries, they are going to walk out of the hospital as one-eyed boys,” said a doctor in Hari Singh Hospital.

Indian security forces are using pellet guns to quell the demonstrators. This duck hunting weapon sends, in each single shot, nearly 600 high velocity ball bearings made of lead; the youngest victim was a four-year-old girl. Rights groups say that pellet gun blinds people and must be banned, India insist that it was a non-lethal weapon.

Congress spokesman Abhishek Manu Singhvi tweeted: “I cannot mourn a man who took up arms against my state”— indeed he played to a hyper-nationalist gallery. When it comes to Kashmir, there is hardly any difference in BJP and Congress, here the secularism of Congress perfectly merges with BJP’s Hindutva. Strategy to quell the unrest is also same: Push in a few thousand more troops into the Valley, shoot more people, declare more curfews, and look the other side when tortures and rapes happen.

Pakistan has taken up the matter with international community; the UN OIC, EU, the P-5 Middle East and African diplomats have been briefed on the gruesome killings of innocent Kashmiris. Advisor to Prime Minister of foreign Affairs has written letters to UNSG, SG of OIC and Chair of UNHRC, highlighting the current happenings in IOK. Our missions abroad are briefing their host governments as well as human rights groups and organization in their areas of accreditation. Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif has declared that Pakistan will continue to support the cause of Kashmiris. Army Chief General Raheel Sharif has also urged the world to respect desires of Kashmiris.

Intifada of Kashmiris has sent a loud and clear message to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi that his agenda to shun talks and instead rely solely on suppressive tactics to address the longstanding dispute, would not work. Kashmiris were looking towards peaceful settlement of the dispute but Modi government has pushed them to the wall. Kashmiris are braving all atrocities and expressing resolve not to accept anything less than end of the Indian occupation.

India’s attempt to camouflage its repressive actions by terming the volatile situation as its internal affair has started receiving rebuke from the world community. The US State Department has declared that Kashmir is not an internal matter of India. “Obviously, we’re concerned about the violence. We encourage all sides to make efforts towards finding a peaceful solution,” Spokesman John Kirby said.

In the wake of ongoing violence, UNSG has once again offered Pakistan and India mediation on Kashmir. Pakistan has appreciated the offer. It is the UN’s official responsibility and obligation to address the issue of Kashmir because there are UN Security Council’s resolutions on it. OIC Secretary General has deplored the use of force by the Indian security forces on innocent Kashmiris in IOK on July 13. OIC’s Independent Permanent Human Rights Commission (IPHRC) has called for an immediate end to the ongoing abrasive human rights violations.

“There is no denial in Delhi … that a problem exists,” said retired Lieutenant General Syed Ata Hasnain, an Indian army corps commander in the area from 2010 to 2012 who was deployed there seven times during his career. “But no one seems to be clear on how to get into engagement with the people on the ground.” The IOK’s deputy chief minister, Nirmal Singh of the BJP, said the government was ready to engage with the Hurriyat under a legal framework. Asked whether police and paramilitary forces used excessive force to control crowds after Wani’s killing, BJP’s Singh replied: “It is a matter of concern”.

Just because not as many were being killed since the uprising in the 1990s, India thought Kashmir was “normal”. The wounds of the 1990s were deep and stayed open. A whole new generation has been added to the population which is, even angrier. And life for a young man in the most militarised area in the world is a series of humiliations, some petty, some overwhelming.   Even the Indian media admits that Kashmir has been on the boil since the killing of Burhan. The killing spree continues and an enraged population is getting desperate.

 

 

 

About admin

Check Also

Rear View: Netaji Bose, Nehru and anti Colonial Struggle

While hoisting Indian flag on the occasion of 75th Anniversary of proclamation of Azad Hind Government, Prime Minster Narendra Modi said that the contributions of Bose, Patel and Ambedkar have been ignored by the ruling Nehru-Gandhi family. Nothing can be farther from truth than this statement of his. One knows that Ambedkar was made the minister in the first Cabinet of India; he was also given the task of being the Chairman of drafting committee of Indian constitution and was asked to draft the Hindu code bill. Sardar Patel was the Deputy Prime Minster, looking after the Home ministry. The compilation of Sardar Patel’s letters has been edited by Durga Das, ‘Sardar Patel Correspondence’. As per this book it becomes clear that Nehru and Patel were very close and till Patel was alive most of the decisions which taken were with his consent or due to his initiative. Patel regarded Nehru as his younger brother and his leader; both. Earlier Modi tried to propagate that Nehru ignored Sardar Patel and did not attend his funeral in Bombay. Morarji Desai’s biography describes that Nehru did attend the funeral; this was also reported in the news papers that time. As far as Netaji Bose is concerned, Nehru and Bose were close ideological colleagues. Both were socialists and part of the left wing of the Congress. Unlike the followers of Hindutva politics, Bose was very secular. Hindu nationalist leaders attacked Subhas Bose incessantly as he dared to reserve jobs for Muslims when he was elected to lead the Calcutta Corporation. Bose was aware of the tremendous injustice that Muslims faced in recruitment. It was Bose who opposed the Muslim and Hindu communalists both. In Tripura Convention of INC, Bose was elected the Chief, but Gandhi was opposed to him mainly on the ground of Non violence. Bose tended to support violent means. Due to opposition within INC; Bose left Congress to form Forward Block, a left party, which has been part of left coalition in West Bengal for a long time. Bose and Nehru were on the same page as far as future of industrialization and public sector was concerned. Bose’s biographer Leonard A Gordan writes about his ideology: As per Bose “Each [person] should privately follow his religious path, but not link it to political and other public issues. Throughout his career, he reached out to Muslim leaders, first of all in his home province of Bengal, to make common cause in the name of India. His ideal, as indeed the ideal of the Indian National Congress, was that all Indians, regardless of region, religious affiliation, or caste join together to make common cause against foreign rulers.” Savarkar also said ‘No support to armed resistance against British’. It is interesting that while Netaji was fighting the British from across the border, Savrkar and Hindutva Nationalists helped the British army which was fighting AHF of Subhash Bose! The claims that Modi and Co. is following the footsteps of Netaji are a claim which has no substance. The matter of fact is that the efforts of Savarkar were acting against the interests of army raised by Netaji. In contrast, while Congress did not agree with Netaji’s line of action, it was Congress which raised the legal support to fight the cases of the personnel of AHF in the aftermath of the war. Bhulabhai Deasi, Kailashnath Katju and Nehru himself came forward to battle in the court rooms on behalf of AHF.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *