Home / Chair's Blog / India Pakistan Tensions

India Pakistan Tensions

Front page editorial: Let us speak with one voice

Published: September 24, 2016
SHARES

Email

The consequences of violence between Pakistan and India are no secret. PHOTO: FILE

The consequences of violence between Pakistan and India are no secret. PHOTO: FILE

A trigger-happy India is whipping up war hysteria. Pakistan can ignore this at its own peril.

The situation is grave enough for this paper to write its first ever front page editorial. We do so to bring the alarming state of affairs into clear focus and cut through the haze generated by Indian jingoism, hyperbole and emotionally drenched rhetoric. A nuclear-armed India threatening violence on a nuclear-armed Pakistan; whichever way you look at it, this cannot end well for either party. And yet, the prospects of violence remain real. Indian belligerency, deliberate as it surely is, may in the end turn out to be nothing more than aggressive posturing aimed less at us and more at Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s own electorate. We hope this may be the case.

Uri assault may be a reaction of atrocities in Kashmir: Nawaz

But hope is never a plan of action. Pakistan’s reaction to India’s dangerous brinkmanship has been restrained but firm. This is a good start. There is no need for Islamabad to indulge in a slanging match with India. The more that New Delhi threatens violence and spews venom at us through its proxies in the media and elsewhere, the more it resembles a state that is unable or unwilling to act maturely in face of pressure. For a nation of a billion people that pretends to carry weight on the global stage, this is shockingly infantile behaviour.

The consequences of violence between Pakistan and India are no secret. Indian strategists have over the years crafted fancy-titled doctrines aimed at convincing themselves they can punish Pakistan without feeling considerable pain themselves. The nuclear equation however has stunted all such doctrines. Pakistan’s deterrence capability is well-documented and firmly locked in place. Let us be very clear: if we did not have this nuclear shield over our heads, India would not have thought twice before embarking on a military adventure.

India may have lost soldiers in the Uri attack, and loss of life anywhere is to be mourned, but Kashmiris living under Indian occupation continue to suffer far worse than Indian troops ever have. New Delhi may froth at the mouth all it wants; it cannot wish away the fact that it is a brutal occupying power with the blood of Kashmiris on its hands.

India, Pakistan could skid into nuclear war, top expert warns

So while Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif took the correct line in his speech at the UN General Assembly, he must go a step further and face up to the prospects of an Indian military misadventure. He must categorically state that the Line of Control is a red line, which if crossed in any way, at any time will trigger an immediate and decisive retaliation. We do not want violence, but India must never forget that Pakistan is not Nepal or Bhutan.

This message must be delivered in one voice by the State and the citizens of Pakistan. There is a time to discuss the failings of our short-sighted policies and their negative consequences. This is not that time. Make no mistake: we are faced with clear and present danger from India. This threat must be met with resolute determination.

India needs to snap out of its self-propelled hysteria and act its size, if not its age.

Published in The Express Tribune, September 24th, 2016.

Courtesy: The Express Tribune

About admin

Check Also

Trump-Kim summit: beginning of another fiasco?

North Korea will have to wait for a while to see what is more hurting: American sanctions or trusting America. It is interesting that after stampeding Iran nuclear deal only weeks ago President Trump found a willing state to ink a fresh but highly vague nuclear framework. True to his usual Madman approach towards diplomacy, Trump has declared that the North Korea is no longer a nuclear threat. NorthKorean media has since switched over to a jubilant mode, calling it a great victory, claiming that North Korea had won major concessions as the US president said: “the World has taken a big step back from potential Nuclear catastrophe!” “No more rocket launches, nuclear testing or research! The hostages are back home with their families. Thank you to Chairman Kim, our day together was historic!” Trump had twittered. Kim had made great gestures prior to summit, dismantling of nuclear testing site, removal of three top military generals and letting go American hostages alongside a promise of a moratorium on missile testing as well. On the other hand, Trump played hard, he even walked away from the summit; he reverse paddled after receiving a big letter from Kim. Retired Admiral Harry Harris, the US ambassador designate to South Korea has challenged Trump's claim that North Korea no longer poses a nuclear threat to the world, saying that "we have to continue to worry about that." North Korea’s media said that President Trump had not only promised to end joint military drills with South Korea, but also to lift sanctions and allow a “step-by-step” denuclearization process, rather than the immediate dismantling of its nuclear program. Independent analysts have pointed to the lack of substance in the agreement that has committed the US to unspecified security guarantees for North Korea in exchange for denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula. Many have said that though Pyongyang had vowed in the past to denuclearize but had repeatedly broken such promises.On paper, there is nothing President Trump could extract from North Korean leader, that Kim’s father and grandfather had not already given to past American presidents. In fact, he got less, at least for now. Did Kim play blind or he has had credible assurances through back channels. While analysts were hoping that after Iran nuclear deal fiasco, it would be Kim, walking away from the summit citing credibility issue with Trump, he was seen as dying for the summit, this eagerness surprised many. Have long biting sanctions sapped Kim’s will to resist, or is there an undercover understanding on the issue between China and the US on the final outcome of settlement.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *