Home / Articles / Perspective From India: Understanding Kashmir Imbroglio 2016

Perspective From India: Understanding Kashmir Imbroglio 2016

Understanding Kashmir Imbroglio 2016

Ram Puniyani

In the din of hysteria created around the military action on LOC, which was in response to the killing of 18 Indian army jawans in Uri, the issue of anguish of people of Kashmir has been undermined. As such India-Pakistan skirmishes (September 2016) are mostly centered on the issue of Kashmir. On one side India’s claim is that Kashmir is the inseparable part of India and no power on the Earth can separate it from India. Pakistan on the other hand raises doubts about the Kashmir’s accession to India, and says that as it is a Muslim majority area and it should be part of Pakistan. The attack on Uri by terrorists killing 18 Indian soldiers has rekindled the issue once again. The whole episode actually begins with the killing of Burhan Wani, a Hijbul Mujahideen commandant who was killed in an encounter by Indian military. After his killing there were two types of reactions yet again.

Indian media presented it as a big achievement in cracking down the militancy. A section of Kashmiri people was shocked and they started coming on streets to protest. The manner of their protests has been that of stone throwing on the police-military forces. In the the painful incidents which followed nearly 80 people have been killed, over 9000 people got injured and many of those injured suffered the pellet injuries leading to the loss of their eyes and penetration of pellets into different parts of their body. Some army-police personnel have also received injuries. The resulting situation led to the imposition of curfew in the state and this curfew had been the longest curfew which was imposed in the state.

In an attempt to restore peace various efforts have been made by the state. Home minister Rajnath Sigh visited the Valley to hold discussions with the state leaders. His and the stand of Government of India has been that they will not hold talks with the separatist leaders. When all party delegation visited the Valley some of the members of the delegation like Sitaram Yechury and D. Raja tried to meet separatist leader S A S Gilani, who refused to meet them.

Curfew was lifted after nearly two months, but the situation remains tense. With the attack by the terrorists in Uri; the whole focus has shifted to the issue of terrorism. As such as for as the disturbance in Kashmir is concerned the Government is alleging that the protestors are mere 5% of the population and they are being instigated by Pakistan. Surely Pakistan has some role in keeping the Kashmir issue alive to bake its own political bread. But the discontent of the section of Kashmir people has been simmering and has reached a peak in last few years. The youth in particular are disgruntled due to the feeling of alienation. The people of Kashmir are double victims. The acts of terror are a regular nuisance to the peace in the valley. No less is the violation of the civic rights of the people from armed forces. The Armed Forces Special Powers act, which is operational in the area, gives impunity to the armed personnel leading the regular harassment of the innocent civilians in the area.

Amnesty reports emanating from Kashmir tell us the extent of such violations. Amnesty International’s report released in Bangalore begins with defining the scale of human rights violations in Kashmir that have been perpetrated by security forces personnel with glaring impunity. The report states that from 1990 to 2011, the Jammu and Kashmir state government reportedly recorded a total of over 43,000 people killed. Of those killed, 21,323 were said to be ‘militants’ 13,226 ‘civilians’ (those not directly involved in the hostilities) killed by armed groups, 5,369 security force personnel killed by armed groups, and 3,642 “civilians” killed by security forces.

The AFSPA, which gives army sweeping powers, leads to extrajudicial executions and other human rights violations. Section seven of the AFSPA makes it mandatory to seek the prior sanction of Central and State authorities in order to prosecute any security force personnel in civilian courts. Under the pretext of protecting national security, the excesses of the security forces go unchallenged. 96% of all complaints brought against the army in Jammu & Kashmir have been dismissed as “false and baseless” or “with other ulterior motives of maligning the image of Armed Forces”.

It is in under these circumstances that every incident in Kashmir acts as a flaring point and the youth in particular come to streets to protest in large number. Their deeper dissatisfaction with the state of prevailing affairs is very painful. In the civilian areas there is a practical army rule, nearly six lakh of army personnel have been deployed there for years. The people of Kashmir do not have the feel of democracy from years and this leads to a deeper dissatisfaction, it is not just a Pakistan inspired problem, while the role of Pakistan in instigating the protests is very much there.

What is the way out? The UPA II had set up the three member interlocutors committee, which in their report wanted the clauses of autonomy of Kashmir Assembly restored, they emphasized on dialogue with the dissident militants and with Pakistan. There has been a constant demand to repeal AFSPA from the region and to reduce the number of armed personnel in the area. The present coalition of PDP and BJP which is ruling the state is very ruthless as far as dealing with dissidence is concerned; their stand of not talking with dissidents has prolonged the restlessness in the area. With Pakistan’s role; the attack on Uri and before that in Pathankot has vitiated the atmosphere further. One remembers that during election campaign the BJP used to assert that with Modi in the seat of power, terrorists dare not attack! That hollow boast stands exposed. The need for peace in the area, the need to give the Kashmiri people as era of calm is needed in the urgent manner. Pakistan needs to be engaged on the matters related to Kashmir. The treaty of accession of 1948 giving autonomy to Kashmir needs to be respected. The report of interlocutors was a major and balanced approach on the issue. It needs to be brought forth and considered seriously for bringing in peace in the region.

http://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/NewsDetail/index/4/8873/Kashmir-Needs-to-Be-Addressed-Urgently

http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/militants-attack-army-headquarters-in-uri-near-loc/article9120760.ece

http://www.huffingtonpost.in/burhan-wani/who-was-burhan-wani-and-why-is-kashmir-mourning-him/

http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/hurriyat-leaders-refuse-to-talk-to-allparty-delegation-members/article9072465.ece

https://www.quora.com/Should-AFSPA-be-revoked-from-Jammu-and-Kashmir

https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2016/08/aakar-patel-answers-questions/

http://www.jammu-kashmir.com/documents/instrument_of_accession.html

 

 

About admin

Check Also

Time to create Rakhine as a Muslim State for Rohingyas

Myanmar insists that Rohingyas are interlopers from Bangladesh despite most of them living for generations in western Rakhine state of Myanmar, they have long been denied basic political rights and liberties. Bangladesh does not accept that Rohingyas have a Bengali lineage. Anthropologists believe that Rohingya roots trace back to Saudi Arabia, who migrated to Myanmar (Burma) around 7th & 8th century AC. Except Bangladesh and Myanmar who think such a return as a good idea, there are hardly any buyers of such forced eviction. United Nations doesn’t want forced eviction to happen. United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Michelle Bachelet, warned that forcing the first batch of about 2,200 Rohingya living in refugee camps to ground zero of mass violence against the minority Muslim group would be a “clear violation” of core international legal principles. Human Rights groups have called the move “dangerous and premature.” A number of Human Rights groups say “they are shocked”. Even the people who will be affected the most, Rohingya Muslims from Myanmar, are upset that their future, once again, is being decided without their input.So far Aung Suu Kyi’s leadership performance has been derisive. No one expected governing to be easy for her, as country’s leader. Her election had ended more than a half-century of military rule; yet the hegemony has not retrieved; and Bonapartism is galore. In pursuit of her over ambitious political objectives, she has been used and discredited by Junta. Suu Kyi had declared ending the long-running ethnic insurgencies that have torn the country apart as her top priority, but her lacklustre peace effort has proved ineffective. Ever since fighting between government forces and ethnic groups has been spiralling up. Though World has been shocked by reports that the military has carried out atrocities, including rape and murder, against the Rohingya, Aung Suu has said little on the matter and done even lesser. Her government’s growing suppression of speech on the Internet seems perverse for a onetime democracy icon who spent 15 years under house arrest. No wonders her popularity is on decline. Growth has slowed and foreign investment has dipped significantly. Suu Kyi faces daunting challenges. In rebuilding the country, she must overcome decades of mismanagement and profiteering by previous military governments that enriched the generals and their cronies and brought the economy to its knees. The biggest stain on Suu Kyi’s record may be her government’s brutal treatment of the Rohingya, and her tepid response to it. Prevailing World order is known for acting very fast in Muslim versus non-Muslim conflicts where outcome is likely to benefit non-Muslims. And it shows criminal negligence when Muslims are likely to gain through political settlement of any such conflict. When pushed too hard, conflict is settled in a way that it’s a paralytic outcome, ensuring mitigation of equitable advantage to Muslim faction of population. Some of the conflicts like Kashmir and Palestine are deliberately kept on back burners as their settlement would benefit Muslim segment of respective population. Myanmar’s Rohingya conflict also falls in “let ferment” category. Likewise is the situation about Afghan and Yemen crisis, as well as simmering Middle East and North African Muslim countries. Muslims are right to assume that current World Order has not served them a fair deal; and unless there is a significant change in its format, Muslims will continue to be marginalised at state, community and individual levels. But the billion dollar question is that how long the current World Political Order would take to assume ownership of Myanmar crisis? Time has already reached for declaring Rakhine as a sovereign State where Rohingyas could live peacefully and practice their religion peacefully.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *