Home / Chair's Blog / Rawat Bipin: A General or a BJP Cow Vigilante

Rawat Bipin: A General or a BJP Cow Vigilante

It appears as if Indian Army Chief, General Bipin Rawat had extensively bunked his military strategy related classes during staff college days. On January 12, he said at a presser: “We will call the [nuclear] bluff of Pakistan. If we will have to really confront, and a task is given to us, we are not going to say we cannot cross the border because they have nuclear weapons”. One wonders whether Rawat Bipin is a General or a BJP Cow Vigilante!

According to the Press Trust of India, Rawat said credible deterrence did not take away the threat of war: “Nuclear weapons are weapons of deterrence. Yes, they are. But to say that they can deter war or they will not allow nations to go to war, in our context that may also not be true.” Bipin tends to forget that nuclear weapons are for deterrence and not for action. And who would know better than Rawat that the situation has been stalemated for decades and India has consistently and for all time evaded all peace-oriented proposals floated by Pakistan.
In a similar gaffe, Rawat has suggested to his government that countries like Nepal, Bhutan, Myanmar, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Afghanistan have to be kept on board as part of a broader strategy to deal with China. Admitting the failure of Indian policies in the region, Rawat said, “The armed forces operating in the state cannot be status quoist, and must evolve new strategies and tactics to deal with the situation.” “You have to keep changing your doctrines and concept and the manner in which you operate in such areas. An overall approach is required to deal with the Kashmir issue,” he added.
The threatening and irresponsible statement by the Indian Army Chief was representative of a sinister mindset that has taken hold of BJP’s India. Prime Minister Narendra Modi had elevated erratic Bipin to his current position on the basis of his so called previous experience in Kashmir. Poor guy has no job to do; but look busy he must. For this, he keeps playing jokers and keeps day-dreaming about doing some surgical strikes into Azad Kashmir and conquering some Chinese territory. However, Kashmiri youth is doing enough to keep him busy. Bipin wishes that these stone pelters should fight with rifles and guns so that he could respond. Nevertheless, Bipin’s orders for use of pallet guns to blind the youth makes a fit case against him in International Criminal Court.
It is improbable that Indian side actually wants to engage in a nuclear conflict, and Pakistan surely does not. A nuclear war is unwinnable. Even a limited exchange would devastate the two countries. Pakistan promptly contacted India through diplomatic channels to convey concerns regarding Rawat’s nuclear faux pas. Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Khawaja Asif responded that India may test Pakistan’s resolve if that is what it wishes to do: “Very irresponsible statement by Indian Army Chief, not befitting his office”. He termed the Indian army chief’s statement as “tantamount to an invitation for a nuclear war. If that is what they desire, they are welcome to test our resolve. The general’s doubt would swiftly be removed, inshallah.”
Interior Minister Ahsan Iqbal said “Nuclear weapons are not pistols or slingshots, they are weapons of mass destruction. Therefore, people expect nuclear powers to behave responsibly.” Spokesperson of Pakistan’s Foreign Office also termed the Indian army chief’s statement as “irresponsible.” Director General of Inter-Services Public Relations responded: “Should they wish to test our resolve they may try and see it for themselves, but we believe it’s a weapon of deterrence not a choice…If India could overpower Pakistan through conventional engagement post-overt nuclearization, it could have done that by now…That’s why India is targeting Pakistan through sub-conventional threat and state-sponsored terrorism”.
With such a cohesive national response from Pakistani leadership, Rawat has no place to hide. Under duress, on January 14, he retraced form his nonsensical stance by acknowledging that space needed to be given to political initiatives as a means of achieving peace and took anchorage with textbook maxim that “Political initiative and all the other initiatives must go simultaneously hand-in-hand and only if all of us function in synergy, we can bring lasting peace in Kashmir”.
General Bipin’s statement on January 12 that his country will handle China’s growing assertiveness and that India had stepped up patrols on their disputed border to head off more standoffs is yet another manifestation of New Delhi’s aggressive and provocative posture. He added that time had come for India to shift focus from western to the northern frontier. Bipin asserted that “China is a powerful country but we are not a weak nation”. India is being provided with all sorts of equipment and technologies by the United States, thus it is not losing any opportunity of raising the ante.
Bipin’s China bluff also came to a naught. Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Lu Kang advised Indian military on January 15 to conscientiously learn the lesson from history. Lu Kang said that high-ranking Indian military official pointed on the military shift of emphasis to the northern border contradicted the important consensus reached by the leaders of the two countries during BRICS conference in Xiamen last September. He added that during the last year, “Sino-Indian relations have experienced some ups and downs…The remark made by the top Indian military officer once again showed that Indian army illegally crossed the border last year. Donglong(Doklam) belongs to China. The Sino-Indian border’s Sikkim [section] has been demarcated by the history…We urge the Indian side to do more things that are conducive to the maintenance of peace and stability.” During last year, India faced humiliation because of its uncalled-for interference in Doklam but it seems it has not learnt any lesson.
“India must evolve its policies in South Asia…I am only seeing a marginal change in the situation,” Rawat said while responding to a question about the situation in Indian occupied Kashmir (IOK). Rawat acknowledged that Kashmiri youth continues to be attracted to the struggle for freedom from India and were rapidly joining separatist groups despite efforts by occupying forces to maintain pressure on them. “I do not think it is time to become over confident and start assuming that the situation in Kashmir has been brought under control,” Rawat conceded.
He argued that India must prepare for two-front war with China and Pakistan. Referring to the 2017 standoff with the Chinese army in the Himalayas, Rawat said the situation on India’s northern border could deteriorate in the future, in which case, Pakistan on the western front could take advantage of the situation. He added that “China is exerting pressure on the Indian border. The country is capable of handling China’s assertiveness.,” Times of India reported. Rawat stated that the troops are “ready to tackle any aggressive manoeuvring China may take up”.
Pakistan is fully capable of defending itself. Region couldn’t make progress without enduring pace and stability. Peaceful environment in the region is imperative for economic progress and wellbeing of the people of South Asia. Who would know better than Bipin that Pakistan’s nuclear resolve has been tested many times over since Brass-tacks days, and it always stood the test very well. Indian leadership is well aware about inherent weaknesses attached to its nuclear button. Rawat’s bellicosity is misplaced. And as regards China, Doklam fiasco shall continue to haunt a couple of Bipin’s successors. This tactical mistake has brought enduring strategic pain to India, smaller countries of South Asia as well the US stand exposed to the reality that India military is no match to Chinese strategic acumen.
And finally, General Rawat Bipin! have a heart, there should be a difference in the quality of posturing by Indian Army Chief and a BJP Cow-vigilante.

About admin

Check Also

Trump-Kim summit: beginning of another fiasco?

North Korea will have to wait for a while to see what is more hurting: American sanctions or trusting America. It is interesting that after stampeding Iran nuclear deal only weeks ago President Trump found a willing state to ink a fresh but highly vague nuclear framework. True to his usual Madman approach towards diplomacy, Trump has declared that the North Korea is no longer a nuclear threat. NorthKorean media has since switched over to a jubilant mode, calling it a great victory, claiming that North Korea had won major concessions as the US president said: “the World has taken a big step back from potential Nuclear catastrophe!” “No more rocket launches, nuclear testing or research! The hostages are back home with their families. Thank you to Chairman Kim, our day together was historic!” Trump had twittered. Kim had made great gestures prior to summit, dismantling of nuclear testing site, removal of three top military generals and letting go American hostages alongside a promise of a moratorium on missile testing as well. On the other hand, Trump played hard, he even walked away from the summit; he reverse paddled after receiving a big letter from Kim. Retired Admiral Harry Harris, the US ambassador designate to South Korea has challenged Trump's claim that North Korea no longer poses a nuclear threat to the world, saying that "we have to continue to worry about that." North Korea’s media said that President Trump had not only promised to end joint military drills with South Korea, but also to lift sanctions and allow a “step-by-step” denuclearization process, rather than the immediate dismantling of its nuclear program. Independent analysts have pointed to the lack of substance in the agreement that has committed the US to unspecified security guarantees for North Korea in exchange for denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula. Many have said that though Pyongyang had vowed in the past to denuclearize but had repeatedly broken such promises.On paper, there is nothing President Trump could extract from North Korean leader, that Kim’s father and grandfather had not already given to past American presidents. In fact, he got less, at least for now. Did Kim play blind or he has had credible assurances through back channels. While analysts were hoping that after Iran nuclear deal fiasco, it would be Kim, walking away from the summit citing credibility issue with Trump, he was seen as dying for the summit, this eagerness surprised many. Have long biting sanctions sapped Kim’s will to resist, or is there an undercover understanding on the issue between China and the US on the final outcome of settlement.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *