Home / Articles / Republic Day: An Icon of National Pride

Republic Day: An Icon of National Pride

His Excellency Maithripala Sirisena, President of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka specially visited Pakistan to be the “Guest of Honour” on Pakistan Day parade. His participation in the parade is a demonstration of the very close ties between Pakistan and Sri Lanka and the respect in which the people and leadership of Pakistan hold the people and leadership of Sri Lanka. This also speaks of well-entrenched relationship that Pakistan enjoys with the countries of South Asia.

On 23rd March 1940, a historic resolution passed by the annual session of Muslim League became the basis for the formation of a new nation-state in South Asia: “No constitutional plan would be workable or acceptable to the Muslims unless geographical contiguous units are demarcated into regions which should be so constituted with such territorial readjustments as may be necessary. That the areas in which the Muslims are numerically in majority as in the North-Western and Eastern zones of India should be grouped to constitute independent states in which the constituent units shall be autonomous and sovereign”.

The Pakistan Resolution was drafted by 25 member working committee of All India Muslim League. The resolution was presented by Maulvi A.K Fazlul Haq at Minto Park (Iqbal Park). The Pakistan Minaret stands where the Lahore Resolution was passed; this monument symbolizes a blossoming flower and reflects the blissfulness of independence.

The concept took over seven years to attract British approval. There were may ups and downs during the intervening period. Most upsetting was the “Cabinet Mission Proposals”, which could have delayed the creation of Pakistan by another 10 years; however, out of hubris, Congress rejected the proposal and, out of sheer good luck, the day was saved for the Muslims of undivided India.  The British plan to partition India into Pakistan and Hindustan configuration was announced on 3rd June 1947.  Main concept of Pakistan was visualized by Dr Muhammad Iqbal and articulated in Allahabad on 29th December 1930. The nomenclature Pakistan was coined on 28th January 1933 by Chaudhary Rehmat Ali. According to Quaid-e-Azam: “Pakistan not only means freedom and independence but the Muslim Ideology which has to be preserved, which has come to us as a precious gift and treasure and which, we hope other will share with us”. It was a foregone conclusion that the two communities will not be able to live under a single political arrangement. Because going by the Westminster model of democracy, Muslims will always remain in minority.

Allama Iqbal is accredited for putting forth the Two-Nation theory, an ideology pointing out that Hindus and Muslims were two separate nations. Muslim culture, tradition, religion, ideology, morals and language were all distinctly different from Hindu ideals. The two nations shared mutually contradicting beliefs. Therefore, an autonomous state consisting of Muslim majority areas of British India was essential to protect Muslims’ political, social and cultural rights.

The roots of the struggle for independence of British India can be traced back to the War of Independence of 1857 which started off as a spontaneous uprising against the excesses by British East India Company soldiers but soon took the shape of a freedom struggle and caused a country wide existential threat to British rule in undivided India. British had presumed that it were Muslims who triggered and sustained the war of independence, and after the war they had made up their mind to avenge the insult.  Under these trying circumstance, Muslim leaders such as Sir Syed Ahmed Khan worked tirelessly for the political, social and economic uplifting of Muslims by mitigating the impact of harsh anti-Muslim measures taken by the colonial rulers.

After independence on 14 August 1947, Pakistan started as a constitutional monarchy with George VI as head of state; and governed under the “Government of India Act 1935”. Principles Committee of the Constituent Assembly drafted the basic outlines of the constitution in 1949. After years of deliberations, the first constitution of Pakistan was enforced on 23 March 1956. This marked the country’s successful transition from Dominion to Islamic Republic. The Governor-General was replaced with President of Pakistan as ceremonial head of state.

Main feature of Republic Day celebrations is a parade at Constitution Avenue in Islamabad. The armed forces of Pakistan organise this parade, which is reflective of military and civil façade of the country. The parade for Republic Day resumed in 2015 after an eight-year suspension. During 2008-15, Pakistan day parades were not held due to security concerns. Now the scope of parade has been expanded by inviting participation of contingents from allied countries. A special feature of last year’s parade was the participation of the People’s Liberation Army of China and Saudi Special Force contingents alongside Turkish Janissary Military band.

The participation of Chinese troops in the parade last year highlighted growing ties between China and Pakistan. President, Mamnoon Hussain, had noted that the participation of Chinese troops marked a “historic moment.” According to Xinhua, China’s state news agency, “A contingent of the guard of honour of the three services of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA)” participated in the parade. “We have come here to convey a message of friendship to Pakistan on behalf of the Chinese people and the Chinese army. We sincerely hope that Pakistan will progress day by day and its army will be stronger and stronger,” Earlier, during China’s own military parade in September 2015, to celebrate the 70th anniversary of the end of World War II in Asia, Pakistan had sent a small contingent of troops to show its support.

Pakistani nation is resolved to redeem its pledge given to its founding fathers that it will protect the homeland. We are a nation with our own distinctive culture and civilization, language, and literature, art, architecture, names and nomenclature, sense of value and protection, legal laws and moral code, aptitude, and ambitions. We have our own distinctive outlook on life and of life. Vision of Pakistan’s founding fathers was prophetic. Post independence behaviour of India towards Pakistan, other neighbours and its own minorities including the scheduled castes indicate that creation of Pakistan was the only way forward for the Muslim majority provinces of British India. Happy Pakistan Day!

 

About admin

Check Also

Time to create Rakhine as a Muslim State for Rohingyas

Myanmar insists that Rohingyas are interlopers from Bangladesh despite most of them living for generations in western Rakhine state of Myanmar, they have long been denied basic political rights and liberties. Bangladesh does not accept that Rohingyas have a Bengali lineage. Anthropologists believe that Rohingya roots trace back to Saudi Arabia, who migrated to Myanmar (Burma) around 7th & 8th century AC. Except Bangladesh and Myanmar who think such a return as a good idea, there are hardly any buyers of such forced eviction. United Nations doesn’t want forced eviction to happen. United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Michelle Bachelet, warned that forcing the first batch of about 2,200 Rohingya living in refugee camps to ground zero of mass violence against the minority Muslim group would be a “clear violation” of core international legal principles. Human Rights groups have called the move “dangerous and premature.” A number of Human Rights groups say “they are shocked”. Even the people who will be affected the most, Rohingya Muslims from Myanmar, are upset that their future, once again, is being decided without their input.So far Aung Suu Kyi’s leadership performance has been derisive. No one expected governing to be easy for her, as country’s leader. Her election had ended more than a half-century of military rule; yet the hegemony has not retrieved; and Bonapartism is galore. In pursuit of her over ambitious political objectives, she has been used and discredited by Junta. Suu Kyi had declared ending the long-running ethnic insurgencies that have torn the country apart as her top priority, but her lacklustre peace effort has proved ineffective. Ever since fighting between government forces and ethnic groups has been spiralling up. Though World has been shocked by reports that the military has carried out atrocities, including rape and murder, against the Rohingya, Aung Suu has said little on the matter and done even lesser. Her government’s growing suppression of speech on the Internet seems perverse for a onetime democracy icon who spent 15 years under house arrest. No wonders her popularity is on decline. Growth has slowed and foreign investment has dipped significantly. Suu Kyi faces daunting challenges. In rebuilding the country, she must overcome decades of mismanagement and profiteering by previous military governments that enriched the generals and their cronies and brought the economy to its knees. The biggest stain on Suu Kyi’s record may be her government’s brutal treatment of the Rohingya, and her tepid response to it. Prevailing World order is known for acting very fast in Muslim versus non-Muslim conflicts where outcome is likely to benefit non-Muslims. And it shows criminal negligence when Muslims are likely to gain through political settlement of any such conflict. When pushed too hard, conflict is settled in a way that it’s a paralytic outcome, ensuring mitigation of equitable advantage to Muslim faction of population. Some of the conflicts like Kashmir and Palestine are deliberately kept on back burners as their settlement would benefit Muslim segment of respective population. Myanmar’s Rohingya conflict also falls in “let ferment” category. Likewise is the situation about Afghan and Yemen crisis, as well as simmering Middle East and North African Muslim countries. Muslims are right to assume that current World Order has not served them a fair deal; and unless there is a significant change in its format, Muslims will continue to be marginalised at state, community and individual levels. But the billion dollar question is that how long the current World Political Order would take to assume ownership of Myanmar crisis? Time has already reached for declaring Rakhine as a sovereign State where Rohingyas could live peacefully and practice their religion peacefully.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *