Home / Articles / Afghan peace process back to Doha

Afghan peace process back to Doha

Afghan peace process back to Doha

Afghan peace process back to Doha
Afghan peace process back to Doha

Marathon talks between US Special Envoy Ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad and Taliban, in Doha, are concentrating on two questions: continuation of American military bases in Afghanistan, and Taliban guarantees of not letting Afghanistan’s territory be used as launching pad against any third country. Taliban are also ready to undertake that they would not support Al-Qaida and Daesh. Mullah Berader is now leading Taliban’s team. Both sides have acknowledged progress on vital points. For the first time Afghan peace process may be moving in the right direction. During the fifth trip of US Special Envoy Ambassador Zalmay to Pakistan, both sided reiterated their shared intent of an Afghan led and Afghan owned political settlement of Afghan conflict. Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid said the dispute highlights a split that has emerged among countries with an interest in the region, with Pakistan and the US pushing Taliban to open talks with Kabul and other countries, including Iran, supporting the Taliban’s stance; “Iran and Qatar are supporting Taliban’s way but Pakistan is saying what the Afghan government and the US wanted”.

Islamabad fears that any hasty withdrawal of foreign forces could trigger an uncontrolled collapse of the Afghan government, leaving a vacuum that could send tens of thousands of refugees across the border. Afghanistan routinely accuses Islamabad of providing support to the Taliban. Pakistani officials deny this but say they have a degree of influence which they have been using to try to persuade the movement to accept peace talks.

Core US interest is to maintain ‘permanent bases’ in Afghanistan. And that’s been the sticking point in the ongoing talks. Special Envoy for Afghan peace Ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad spent another five days in Pakistan in search of Afghan peace for which President Trump gave him six months, out of which he has almost consumed three. While in Pakistan he held talks with national leadership. He held talks with foreign office regarding the Afghan peace process, negotiations process with Afghan Taliban and timeframe for US military’s withdrawal from Afghanistan. His visit to Pakistan was part of a larger two weeks sojourn to four countries of this region including China, India and Afghanistan, with an aim to “facilitate a negotiated settlement to the conflict in Afghanistan”.

The US State Department has stated that its Special envoy continues to coordinate his peace efforts with President Ashraf Ghani, Chief Executive Abdullah Abdullah, and other Afghan stakeholders to ensure forward traction of an intra-Afghan peace process. During his earlier visit in December, Khalilzad had reiterated that the only solution to the Afghan conflict was for all parties to sit together and reach an agreement on the political future of the country with mutual respect and acceptance.

Taliban think: “The United States agreed during the Doha meeting in the month of November 2018 about discussing the withdrawal of foreign forces from Afghanistan and preventing Afghanistan from being used against other countries in the upcoming meeting”. And the US “is now backing away from that agenda and is [now] unilaterally adding new subjects.”

Afghan peace process back to Doha
Afghan peace process back to Doha

The latest push for seeking a political solution to the war has brought back Saudi Arabia and the UAE at the centre stage in the Afghan peace process. The US, through the greater involvement of these countries, wants to put pressure on the Taliban to accept its main demands. And since then, Saudi Arabia and the UAE have been trying to convince the Taliban to accept the US demand in return for a major share in the Afghan government and other incentives.  But Taliban are not taking the bait and have refused to participate if any further talks at these two venue, they prefer to revert back to Doha. Pakistan is aware that Afghanistan will continue to need huge amounts of foreign aid to keep its shattered economy afloat after any peace settlement.

In a statement, the Taliban have said America must pursue the peace talks with “sincere intentions” or they “will be forced to stall all talks and negotiations until America ends her unlawful pressures and manoeuvring and steps forward towards true peace.” America continues to maintain its ambiguous denial mode by insisting that any final settlement must be led by Afghans themselves. “The US goal is to promote dialogue among Afghans about how to end the conflict, and to encourage the parties to come together at the negotiating table to reach a political settlement in which every Afghan citizen enjoys equal rights and responsibilities under the rule of law,” the US embassy in Kabul said in a statement. However, the leaders of the insurgent group have rejected requests from the US and regional powers to deal directly with the government in Kabul, which it considers as an illegitimate foreign-imposed regime.

As of now, maintaining long-term military bases and firm guarantees of the Afghan soil not being used again to stage attacks in the West and other countries are two major US demands in talks with Taliban. In exchange, America along with its western as well as Arab allies would provide substantial financial assistance for the reconstruction and rehabilitation of Afghanistan through a comprehensive peace deal. Although the Taliban have repeatedly demanded complete withdrawal of the US forces from Afghanistan, they showed an inclination to discuss the suggestion of the US maintaining certain bases in the recent negotiations held in the UAE. Talks in Abu Dhabi were brokered by Pakistan after President Donald Trump wrote a letter to Prime Minister Imran Khan, seeking Islamabad’s help in reaching out to the Taliban.

Americans have conceded that its bases would have no role in the Afghan security but are meant for maintaining presence for an overall regional stability. Other peripheral objective is to keep close contact with the future Afghan governments in order to ensure that the country does not become a safe haven for any terrorist organisations.

Pakistan is not averse to the US’ demands but wants a ‘regional consensus’ on it since permanent presence of the US military in Afghanistan would certainly raise eyebrows in Russia, Iran and even China. These countries fear that the US may use the Afghan soil to advance its own strategic designs in the region. For this reason, Pakistan is striving to evolve a regional consensus on the possible Afghan peace deal.  Guarantees and assurances aimed at promoting peace and security of both Afghanistan and other countries are understandable. However, demand for permanent military presence is indicative of the desire not only to keep Afghans subjugated but also to brow-beat other regional countries.

About admin

Check Also


New Zealand Massacre: ‘Clash of Civilizations’ thesis Stalks the World!

The horrific massacre in Christchurch, New Zealand on 15th March, Friday 2019 has shaken the World. The killer, Brenton Harrison Tarrant, is an Australian citizen. Nearly 50 People died in the attack as two mosques were attacked. Those killed include nine from India. Tarrant had fixed the camera on his head so as to live stream the massacre. What prompted him to undertake this violence was his ideology which holds that today Europe is facing the threat of Muslim immigration and violence. The Christchurch terrorist was consumed by intense racism and hatred of Muslims. He posted a long statement, “manifesto” on ‘white nationalism’ before undertaking the dastardly act. All over the World there were diverse reactions to this horrific act. New Zealand Prime Minster Jacinda Ardern, who at 38 years of age is also among the youngest heads of government in the world, declared that the victims, many of whom may be migrants or refugees, “are us” and the shooter “is not”. The overriding theme of the Prime Minister’s statements was that her country represents “diversity, compassion and refuge”. “I want to assure people… that all our agencies are responding in the most appropriate way that includes at our borders.” The Pope in a very touching speech said, “In these days, in addition to the pain of wars and conflicts that do not cease to afflict humanity, there have been the victims of the horrible attack against two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand… I am close to our Muslim brothers and all that community… ”Today we are facing the times where American politics of control over oil wells led to the formations like Al Qaeda and after 9/11 twin tower attacks; US media popularized the phrase Islamic terrorism. What we are witnessing today is the fall out of the policy which has been pursued to control oil wealth. The aftermath of this has been the White Nationalism which has resulted in Islam-Muslim phobia, which needs to be countered ideologically by promoting the inherent global tendency of alliance between diverse cultures. What is noteworthy is that there is strong parallels between Breivik’s manifesto and ideology of Hindu nationalism – or Hindutva – on the question of nature of Islam—Muslims and coexistence with Muslims. Much like European mainstream rightwing parties BJP in India does condemn the violence for name sake but does not condemn the underlying ideology which is based on Islam phobia.

Leave a Reply

Your e-mail address will not be published. Required fields are marked *